 |
| Not yet in print. Coming soon. |
My new, amusing novel ‘Isaac Newton’s 21st
Century Entanglement’ is in the process of being published. It is humorous but is based
on the serious physics of particle entanglement – Einstein’s “Spooky Action at
a Distance”.
This consensus science avers that two subatomic particles, usually created from a
single particle or energetic event, might fly apart but remain in communication
and affect each other over distances. In experiments, Entangled Particles are often two
photons, which separate at the speed of light, and even if they go to opposite
sides of the universe, they are always in contact – and affect, mirror, each
other’s state or behaviour.
The novel takes this proven process and employs it as a mechanism
for time-travel. After all, it is a Sci-Fi novel.
Over the past year, the physics of entanglement
has particularly occupied my attention. Theoretically, if two photons fly to
the opposite horizons of the universe, both at the “speed” of light, they separate
at twice the speed of light. We all know that such speed is banned and deemed impossible
by Einstein’s Relativity and Feynman’s QED. “Nothing travels faster than light”.
However, experiments in PE, Particle Entanglement, demonstrate that PE is real;
they do affect each other, seemingly instantaneously, via a mysterious communication;
Einstein’s spooky action at a distance i.e. faster than light.
I’ve proposed a mechanism that causes gravity
– an equally mysterious force that operates between objects, it seems, over any
distance. Science does not propose that gravity operates faster than light. But
are there common factors? I take the question back to the primary particles –
photons. My gravity idea requires that photons have slight mass.
A photon is a quantum particle of light which “travels” or more
correctly which propagates, at 300,000 km per second in particles and waves
(wavicles). I think that photons are never alone. When energy creates or
releases a photon, at the location of creation, at the energetic event, is a
globe – not a gun that fires a photon bullet. On a larger scale – e.g. The North Star, the
radiation that tells us the star exists is a globe. Fly around the star, North,
South, East or West, and it will be seen as a globe. The radiation is emanating
in globular rings - spheres, moving towards our eyes or instruments. A single,
none globular photon does not exist. What is created is a wave. Even at the
power of just one-photon, it is a wavicle, moving out into space as a globe. Wherever
our eyes intercept that sphere, or vice-verse, we “see” a particle, a photon –
a quantum packet of energy. But it is not a separate minuscule ball of light.
It is an energetic wave broadcasting the presence of the object, be it a star
or a sub-atomic event.
Let’s take a single small light-bulb. The
filament is heated by pumping through electricity. It glows and radiates a
sphere. I’m thinking that where the outer-sphere touches any object there is an
electron exchange/ reaction, be it with a dust particle or a substantial
object. Where the sphere touches /intercepts – Here-Be-Photons. The sphere is
the wave – propagating at light-speed – it does not consist of photons, it is “pure”
energy; but at any point that collides with any foreign body – the collision focuses
or draws the energy to that point. So,
the sphere appears to be made of photons. But it is not – until it intercepts.
To account for the quantum (a precise quantity of stuff - usually very tiny), imagine the
filament emanates continuous light, in waves, in peaks and troughs, in spheres.
These spheres are propagating a quantum distance apart – maybe the Planck
length and time.
Touch or examine the spheres – perhaps with another sphere
of radiation or with your finger – and at the intersection we find a photon.
Rather like those toy-globes of static electricity, full of lightning, that
responds to your fingers moving over the glass. So, any interception on any point
on the sphere is a photon.
We, the experimenters, want to see twin photons
moving apart? We generate an event with the power of a single-photon in a black,
blank space. A sphere forms at the event. It expands. It is an expanding sphere.
We test the right-hand-side and find a photon. We test the left hand-side and
find another photon. We see two photons, very close together, generated from one-event.
We track both photons. Unknown to us, they are focuses of the pure-energy of
the expanding sphere. The sphere is the permanent energy, the photons are
ephemeral. They manifest only when we look. They manifest every-time we look
/intercept /examine them.
We cannot see the sphere – we only see
the photons. They each move apart (as the sphere expands) at the speed of
light. There is nothing in science we know of that can communicate on the straight
line between the twins. They appear to be separate but are actually products of
the same expanding sphere. They are moving apart at the speed of light – or (heresy)
even faster. We spin or charge or otherwise affect one of the twins; it isn’t real
and permanent, the sphere is the reality. We are affecting the entire sphere.
The 2nd twin we have identified is altered by our impact on the 1st
photon. It probably shows an equal and opposite reaction to maintain the
integrity and energy-balance of the sphere. We are playing with Entangled
Particles. The same causes and outcomes would be true for other entangled sub-atomic
particles. Where we identify twins – there are in fact multitudes. The particles
are legion. They are everywhere we care to look. ALL the particles on a sphere
are entangled. Tweak one and the sphere changes – and changes all the particles
we can find on that sphere.
It gets a little complicated when we consider the endless procession of quantum separated spheres - generated from a light-bulb by the energy input, usually electricity. It is easier to have just one sphere - but there are in fact trillions, broadcasting from every object of every size. That is how we detect them, how we detect all "things" - by their reflected or internally generated energy.
Now – Choose a spot of intergalactic “empty”
space. Many light years outside the Milky Way Galaxy – a lonely black empty
sphere – of, say, the size of Earth’s Moon. But empty. Nothing there. However –
set up detecting instruments and point them at the centre of the galaxy. The
instruments will detect trillions of energetic events – from particle collisions
to collisions of solar-systems. They all broadcast their activities as energetic
spheres. All the sphere’s intersect. At the myriad intersections we see particles.
Our instruments – say, the human eye, can see the whole of the universe – communicated
via the expanding spheres – separated by quantum distances and times. What we
cannot “see” yet, is the medium that supports or builds the sphere’s. We are
blind to the spheres, which are the structure of the universe. We do not know
what they are made of (Dark Matter? – Dark Energy?). But they are there. There
is no such thing as Empty-Space. We are, I’m afraid, back to the Victorian’s
Aether. I call it the Aether-Matrix.
This idea ties into my theory of what
gravity is – as distinct from what gravity does.
MORE: Follow the label "Gravity" below. It's quite a long read. But worth the trouble.
No comments:
Post a Comment