Monday, 18 January 2021

MY T.O.E OR NEARLY EVERYTHING AND TIME TRAVEL

 




http://www.noelhodson.com/index_files/Life-Universe-Everything-8Mar2011.pdf


Following on from the above slides and my blogs on the six forces, Gravity, Electromagnetism. Strong Nuclear, Weak Nuclear, Time and Lifeforce, this sketches the dim glimmer of an idea that might be developed, or not, as the case may be. I think that, as the slides conclude, history has mass, which is evident in the electromagnetic waves that emanate or propagate from all and any core object and fill the space from that core (the real object) to the outer, expanding periphery of the object's sphere. It is the sphere that we "see" and which enables us to locate and study the object. We also generate or reflect our own identifying sphere, which enables others to identify us by intercepting the data broadcast to the periphery of our sphere. Thus, everything we see is a historic image from the past, as far back in the past as the time it takes for the light to travel or propagate from the core object to the periphery or horizon on the expanding sphere. Note the inspiration from descriptions of Black Holes.

We "see" all objects where our own sphere and the object's sphere intercept. It might be that particles result at the points of interception. The data or information from the core is visible on every point of the sphere. We can see an object from any position we take relative to the core, because the data is broadcast to the periphery. We are viewing history. At very close range, with split-second time elapsing, where the core and the viewer are simultaneous, they might merge their spheres and become one object. 

So far, so good. I think this construct makes scientific sense. 

What probably doesn't make any sense, again borrowing from Black Hole event horizon essays, is: am I the viewer, or my two-dimensional image, captured on the expanding sphere of the distant object? I am now confused and cannot explain how such a 2D image might form. But let's continue. The data /information from the object, say the Sun, is definitely visible at any point on its sphere. I speculate in previous essays that Spooky Action at A Distance from "entanglement" occurs when we intercept and interfere with the particle/s where our sphere's meet; where our energy changes the particle on the Sun's expanding sphere; and so alter the characteristics of the sphere - and so alter all the particles on that sphere, at every point on the sphere. Thus, nearby particles having travelled for 8 minutes (history) and 93 million miles, which I affect, equally affect, say an entangled particle, 93 million miles on the far side from my position. My observational reach is now 186 million miles. 

We have entered the realms of Science Fiction. My 2D photographic image is perhaps also present on the far side of the Sun's sphere, 186 million miles from my core, which is the real me. I am having an impact on the electromagnetic waves that propagate from the Sun and form a radio sphere at a radius of 93 million miles. I alter the sphere. That impact will affect every point on the Sun's broadcasting sphere. Now, let's be bold and switch from gazing at the Sun to studying the Milky Way, which I also see only because the galaxy also broadcasts its presence, its existence (stands out) via an expanding sphere - until it arrives at my eyeballs and fevered brain. Can my holographic 2D self happily roam about on the far side of the galaxy? 

The thought has been bugging me for months; so I here broadcast it to perplex other similarly stricken theorists or SF authors. Answers on a postcard please to noel@noelhodson.com  . 


Read More: 

FUSION, GRAVITY, INERTIA, LIFEFORCE.

 


Friday, 15 January 2021

PEACE IN OUR TIME - APPEASING TRUMP'S MOB - by Mel Cooper

 

Trump Mob Storms Capitol Hill - Jan 2021

Independent Appeasers

By Mel Cooper

 

This morning when I opened up my news feed there was a headline that caught my eye immediately. It was: Impeaching Trump Again is Unnecessary and Risks Further Dividing the US. This was the editorial in the UK Independent newspaper. My first reaction? Annoyance. Further reactions? Absolute fury and concern.

 

So, I thought, here we are back in 1938 again and the thinking press of the UK is advocating Appeasement; as PM Stanley Baldwin offered to Hitler – celebrating “Peace In Our Time”. What this editorial headline says to me immediately, before even having to read the crawling editorial itself, is that people are more worried about the Storm Troopers and what they might say and do than they are about the truth. Also, that the primacy of Justice is downgraded to make room for crawling cowardice and self-serving short-term thinking.

 

Donald Trump is a criminal. It is not as if his criminality and betrayal of his country are hidden away or in any way ambiguous. Like a Mafia don, he tried to make the Secretary of State of Georgia an offer he could not refuse - if he only found an extra 12,000 or so votes somehow in the State of Georgia for Donald. He should be impeached for that alone. And be fair to the Secretary of State. He politely and diplomatically decided not to publish the recording of the phone call unless and until the Donald attacked him; which, true to form, the President of the United States did, thus compounding his crime of trying to vote-fix by lying further when confronted with his own dangerous mendacity.

 

Meantime, the Donald, Humpty Trumpty, was tweeting to his followers to come to Washington on 6 January, come by the millions, march on the Capitol and Stop the Steal! (Interesting how Donald goes for 3 word slogans? Pity! Catchy! Distilled lies!) He was actually asking his followers to interfere with the due process of the election, which had already been declared in dozens and dozens of court cases to be totally legal and correct.

 

“Stop the Steal.”

Then we get Trump, his son Trump Jnr, Giuliani, etc, addressing the crowd (not millions but 50,000 or so.  Who counted?) and telling them not to be cowards. Today is the day that we start fighting. Today we take back control. Today we kick ass. Today you have to be a hero, or you will be a zero. Today we take back the election that was stolen from us. (Wonder where they got that slogan. Brexit perhaps: Take Back Control)

 

If after all that we are supposed to look the other way, then we are in serious trouble. No, it will NOT further divide a divided nation. The Storm Troopers aren’t going to listen anyway. We should stop even trying to convert them. And people with half a brain and some eyesight and hearing are fully aware of what has been going on with the Donald all of his life - more ramped-up since he started running for president. Piers Morgan is saddened by how much the Donald has changed since he first was an admiring friend. I have news for Piers Morgan. Donald Trump has not changed. He was always like this. It was always an act and he always created the scripts that he needed and then worked from them. And our very own Boris Johnson revered him as a hero and a role model, so think about that too.  (Not to mention the ass-licking, brown-nosing, creepy snake known as Nigel Farage, the would-be German citizen.)

 

But to suggest that we should not impeach this criminal, this proto-Fascist because it will upset his followers and they might then do bad things, is more or less in the same moral and intellectual camp as giving Hitler the Sudetenland, or insisting that even if Dreyfus is innocent, he should stay on Devil’s Island because it is more patriotic to uphold the good name of the army of France.

 

Once every two or three generations a test comes along. And The Independent has just sat the exam and has given very much the wrong answer. Indeed, it has got a D minus. It has not failed completely. At least it recognizes in its answer that wrongs have been done and the President of the United States is criminal. The whole world has now seen his criminality in action in no uncertain terms. And they are right to think that Trump’s Storm Troopers are dangerous.

 

All those years he has not so much been lying as feeding his followers propaganda. Yes, folks, he has been following the Goebbels Play Book, the Mussolini Martini mixer, that poisons the mind, appeals to paranoia, provokes racism, and finds Another upon whom to blame all your woes in this world that will then be fixed by your new Gawd, Hilter, Mussolini or Franco or … Donald Trump. Our hero, our Gawd. It’s also called Brainwashing; and the followers’ brains are totally cleansed of any aspect of inhibition against violence, tolerance of any other viewpoint, tolerance of anyone who is not White and created in their image.

 

As I have said before, MAGA really means MAWA: Make America White Again. And they carry guns!

 

But they are a minority. However large the minority, it is still a minority. And among them are many people who would waver, who would be able to wake up from the hypnotism that has been perpetrated upon them; and who will not wake up unless they see people try to do WHAT IS RIGHT! It will be tough; it may take time for the message to sink in. But if Nancy Pelosi and the other Democrats and sane Republicans (the ten who voted for impeachment) don’t invoke the law and do what they can to bring Donald Trump and enablers and his cohorts of cultists to justice, if they are not seen to try to apply justice, then that will be the ultimate betrayal and also the ultimate stupidity. Because as with any form of appeasement, that will just make the enemy stronger. They will see that they can get away with it and they will then start trying to get away with even more.

 

It may indeed provoke riots and violence if you impeach Trump. But that is the reaction of a cult at bay, being defanged. Not to impeach Trump, not to sue him in all the courts of the land for his various nefarious deeds over the year, is what will empower the Storm Troopers. Anything to do with Trump is always going to be a Lose-Lose situation. The brave thing is to choose the terms of the loss and be ready to confront it. Not to impeach Trump is a reneging of duty. As our friend Noel Hodson said, that is like saying you must not prosecute Jack the Ripper because people will think you are infringing his human rights and his fellow serial killers might get angry and riot.

 

So, I have only one thing to say to the Independent: you should be ashamed of yourselves.

 

 

Wednesday, 13 January 2021

POLITICANS AND PERFORMERS: The World is Now a Stage

 



 

POLITICANS AND PERFORMERS: The World is Now a Stage

By Mel Cooper

 

Shakespeare said that “All the World’s a stage” and that all the men and women of this world are merely players on that stage. They play their parts and they have exits and entrances, just as in the theatre.

 

Well, the realm of politics seems to me to bear out this metaphor spectacularly these days. Indeed, I would say that sometimes watching the politicians on the news is the most interesting show in town.

 

Certainly, given the proliferation and increasing influence of all the new media, a lot of political discourse and events have become, essentially, reality TV shows (or Reality YouTube?). We follow them with the same verve and voyeurism as people follow the Big Brother House or Love Island. Perhaps it would make our lives easier if we simply accepted this and saw the news every day as another form of theatrical entertainment? So here, at Performance Now, we are going to give that a try.

 

Of course, in America, this is doubly so because of President Donald Trump, who treats everything he does as if he is competing for ratings. He even runs elections that way; and the media give him the platform he wants for that purpose. He used that platform not so long ago to whip up chaos and rioting; and finally to show incontrovertibly what he is about. It is not so much that he is the Liar-in-Chief; more that he is a Propagandist Extraordinary in the mould of the Fascists of the 1920s and 1930s, and therefore has, I think now, been working these past 5 years and more to brainwash his followers into becoming his Storm Troopers. He has succeeded, and the USA is now at a very dangerous moment in its history. He has succeeded through, I believe, extremely calculated and consistent performance.

 

This seem to me also to be true in the UK where the Prime Minister has been auditioning for his certification as a Genuine Professional Clown for decades. That is a good cover for what he may actually be up to, folks.  And these self-serving, power grabbing performances to get support for toxic hidden agendas are happening in many other places as well, especially in the territories of the more right wing neo-populist regimes.

 

I have been struck by this idea all over again because of two performances that I caught just recently, before the events at the Capitol in Washington. The first was on Sky News.  They invited Peter Hitchens to comment on the newspaper headlines. His basic stance and argument was that the whole Covid epidemic is simply exaggerated. Hitchens insisted vociferously that Covid is not much worse than any seasonal flu; that the reportage of so many deaths is fake news, that people die from things all the time and especially in midwinter, so there is no need to get excited about it. The whole Covid thing is exaggerated. The motive for them to exaggerate is that they want to scare us so that they can control us.  So don’t believe this lie and you will be free, free. It is all about liberty!

 

Now, in some ways he was merely reading from one of the standard scripts of the people who like to deny. I have heard it all before. So why was I so exercised this time? Firstly, because in playing his part as a Covid Leaver, the Peter Hitchens Act was especially well-prepared and his performance was very confident and therefore he might have convinced some people who would rather believe a comforting fantasy than the evidence that is actually available.

 

Secondly, because he was saying all this when the very news programme he was on had just read out the latest figures of infections and deaths and shown charts that demonstrated that the Covid plague has now been more out of control for the past weeks in several countries including the UK than it has ever been before; and that that this is at least partly because there is a new strain to the virus that is far more transmissible. Hitchens was also not prepared to concede that perhaps the schools – and indeed the whole country – might need to be locked down as a crude but effective way of trying to suppress the spread of the virus until enough people can be vaccinated. I am not sure he even thinks we need vaccines! He is probably even one of those cranks who thinks the vaccines poison us. As someone who was given the first polio vaccine and knew people with polio as a child who have suffered immeasurably all their lives because they got polio before the vaccine was available, I promise you I’m a full believer in vaccines . Yes, there may be side effects; but that is rare; and the vaccines are always rigorously tested and monitored by law in our society. What is the bigger risk: Covid or the vaccine?

 

What struck me more than all this Hitchens illogical thinking, however, is that the presenter and the other guest who did not agree with Hitchens were at no point willing to treat what Hitchens was saying as anything but another opinion. No one reacted to the flaws in his position, the shallowness of his stance; no one said he was lying (which he effectively was doing), nor did they challenge him for his irresponsible and dangerous statements that play directly into the prejudices, fears and dangerous actions of a proportion of our citizens.

 

And that is the nub of why people are not learning or facing the truth. This is one of the ways that the Brexit debate was lost too. It seems that the priority for almost all broadcasters these days is to be so balanced and neutral that whatever is said is a matter of opinion, nothing more, that must be respected like any other matter of opinion. It also seems that they are more interested in entertaining you and pressing your emotional buzzers than they are in presenting you with cogent, intelligent and logical truths or debates. Hence all the many appearances of people the likes of Nigel Farage on TV over the years, all the articles he wrote, all the interviews he gave, being given huge amounts of space; effectively giving his lying agenda a platform that he could not hope to buy with all the money available to him. The same with Boris Johnson and when he promoting Brexit. The propaganda he was spouting was treated as an alternative truth.

 

But Covid is not a matter of opinion. It is a complex and possibly fatal disease and you cannot simply argue it away by stating that government or medical practitioners are exaggerating. Ask hospitals in the UK or in California at the moment. On the other hand, Hitchens, like Farage, is in his way provocative entertainment and so he is both given the platform and treated politely without any real challenge. He is, in effect, performing.

 

Later in the same news cycle, came the tape of President Donald Trump phoning the Secretary of State in Georgia, Brad Raffensperger. On this call Trump was clearly playing Marlon Brando in The Godfather. Actually, Brando was somewhat less sinister and more direct. All the requests by Trump for Raffensperger to find a few thousand more votes; and all Trump’s appeal for loyalty to himself, through the fact that the Secretary of State was a Fellow Republican, sounded as if he was building up to making Raffensperger an offer he could not refuse.

 

Fortunately, Brad Raffensperger had enough integrity (amounting to the heroic under the circumstances) simply to stick to the facts. There is no evidence of fraud in the voting; there is no evidence of rigged machines. So what did Trump do next? Having spent quite some time summoning his cohorts to Washington to try to disrupt the process of counting the electoral votes, he went to the crowd. He brought his son, he brought Rudy Giuliani, he brought others; and they all wound up at the gathering of Trump Storm Troopers and set them loose. I love the bit where he was playing the part to the hilt and promising to go with them, march with them, to the Capitol. Of course he didn’t! He was having a party to watch what he clearly hoped would escalate so that he could declare a State of Emergency, bring in the troops, declare Martial Law and refuse to step down as President. At least that is how the subtext of that play looked to me!

 

Maybe you could give Trump the benefit of the doubt and decide Trump was not “lying”? Maybe he is so delusional that he is stating what he really believes? If so, then maybe he is simply mentally ill. He is so damaged and narcissistic that he cannot accept that he lost the election and so the only possible explanation he can understand is that somehow the election was rigged against him. The election must have been stolen because losing was not an option – and he truly believes this even after being told over and over that this is simply not the case.

 

That is another possible subtext to read into the Trump movie script.

 

However, I believe another possibility. He is actually acting his part quite consciously and cynically. He is playing out his own TV reality show. And he is craftily setting things up so that he can move on after 20 January 2021 to a career with an audience of about 74 million loyal fans. Of course, the two possibilities are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

 

All this fits, with increasing certainty, into the proposition that all the world truly is now a stage for politicians and others; that YouTube and Facebook and Twitter are nothing but “reality” entertainment and performance platforms; that most of the women and men are playing their parts as scripted by themselves or their supporters who have their covert agendas; and that many of these politicians truly are actors and not much more.

 

Fortunately, though they have their entrances, sooner or later all these people will have their exits.   Mel Cooper, Oxford, Jan 13th 2021


Saturday, 2 January 2021

GRAVITY - TIME - ELECTROMAGNETISM - WEAK NUCLEAR - STRONG NUCLEAR - LIFEFORCE

 


2nd January 2021:

http://www.noelhodson.com/index_files/Life-Universe-Everything-8Mar2011.pdf

26 of 28 TIME – DARK ENERGY – DARK MATTER From: Noel Hodson Sent: 21 November 2020 11:41 To: 'jlevin@barnard.edu’ jlevin@barnard.edu Subject: Black Hole Survival Guide 21 NOV 2020 - Dear Professor Levin, A friend gave me your Black Hole Survival Guide. It elucidates some of the most profound cosmic mysteries. An excellent short summary, with excellent metaphors and similes to illustrate your concepts - and convey them relatively painlessly into my thick-skull. You might care to add to your information and thinking, ideas that have occurred to me over the past 60 years. See this link. Friday, 23 October 2020 GRAVITY ETC. - RECAP OCT 20 It is probable that all objects in the universe, including black-holes and ourselves, have an event horizon. Where these horizons meet wavicles are created that we name as particles. Thus, no object “sees” the reality of any other object. We “see” and exchange in-form-ation at the event horizons. These horizons are spheres emanating from the “real” object at the core within. When we humans (our spheres) observe or react with a particle/wavicle on the surface of another sphere – it affects the entire sphere and thus all particles on the sphere; action at a distance. Best wishes - (Mr) Noel Hodson 

Everything we “see” in the universe is in the past. Whether it is 1 metre or 1 million light years away, its light takes time to reach us. The distance between it and us is filled with broadcast spheres of quantized propagating light. The space between is not empty. It is always full. Go halfway to the Sun and its light-waves will strike you in what we had thought to be empty-space. The broadcasts are dark-matter. Their expanding propagation is dark-energy. If the spheres, the event-horizons, stop broadcasting then the object disappears. It ceases to exist (stand-out). The history of the waves, over Time, is real energy. History has mass. Time is dark-matter. 

http://www.noelhodson.com/index_files/Life-Universe-Everything-8Mar2011.pdf


28 of 28 Sources and resources: New Scientist Issues 1 to 3312 – Scientific American 1958 to 1992 – University of Oxford Dept for Continuing Education, Particle & Astrophysics, Tutor David Chapple, Jan 2010 to Jan 2014. – BOOKS : Gravity, Brian Glegg – Nothing, New Scientist – Newton Never at Rest, Richard S Westfall – Paradoxes of Time Travel, Ryan Wasserman – Lightspeed, John C.H. Spence – Electric Universe, David Bodanis – The Quark and the Jaguar, Murray Gell-Mann – The Science Delusion, Rupert Sheldrake – The Ascent Of Gravity, Marcus Chown – The Order of Time, Carlo Rovelli – Seven Brief Lessons on Physics, Carlo Rovelli – Supersymmestry (Superposition), David Walton – Infinity in the palm of your hand, Marcus Chown – The Theory of Relativity: and other essays, Albert Einstein – The Quantum World, NS – QED, Richard Feynman – Elementary Particles and the Laws of Physics, Richard P Feynman – The speed of mass, Philip J Morgan – Everything is Physics, Andrew Worsley – What we cannot know: Marcus du Sautoy – Douglas Adams – The Great Mathematicians, Raymond Flood, Robin Wilson – The Stuff of the Universe, John Gribben & Martin Rees – The Scientific Exploration of Mars, Frederic W. Taylor – Schrodinger’s Kittens and the search for reality, John Gribbin – The Number Mysteries, Marcus du Sautoy – Chaos, James Gleick – The Tao of Physics, Fritjof Capra – The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins – About Time, Einstein’s unfinished revolution, Paul Davies, - Einstein’s Cosmos, Michio Kaku – The Music of the Primes, Marcus du Sautoy – Leonardo The First Scientist, Michael White – The Diversity of Life, Edward O Wilson – The Ghost in the Atom, PCW Davies & JR Brown – The Elegant Universe, Brian Greene – The Science of Genetics, Charlotte Auerbach – Richard Feynman and modern physics, James Gleick – Modern Science Writing, Richard Dawkins – The Dreams that Stuff is Made Of, Stephen Hawking – Inside the Centre, Oppenheimer, by Ray Monk – The Code Book, Simon Singh – Isaac Newton, James Gleick – The Void, Frank Close – INNUMERACY, John Allen Paulos – Einstein, Banesh Hoffman & Helen Dukas – What do you care what other people think? , Richard Feynman – The Dancing Wu Li Masters, Gary Zukav – Sustainable Energy without the hot air, David JC MacKay – The Goldilocks Enigma, Paul Davies – The Joy of Pi, David Blatner – Five Equatios that changed the world, Michael Guillen – The Case of the Missing Neutrino, John Gribbin – Constructing Reality, John Marburger – Astronomy, Fred Hoyle – Viruses from Space, Fred Hoyle & Chandra Wikramahsinge & John Watkins – ASIMOV Guide to Science – Einstein for Beginners, Joseph Schwartz & Michael McGuiness – Before the Beginning, on Stephen Hawking by Martin Rees - A natural history of zero, Robert Kaplan – Catching the Light, Arthur Zajonc – In Search of Schrodinger’s Cat, John Gribbin – QED The strange theory of light and matter, Richard P. Feynman – The End of Time, Julian Babour – The Last Three Minutes, Paul Davies – The Quantum Society, Danah Zohar & Ian Marshall – The Cosmic Blueprint, Paul Davies – The Trouble with Physics, Lee Smolin – The Astonishing Hypothesis, Francis Crick – The Birth of Time, John Gribbin – In Search of the Edge of Time, John Gribbin – Six Easy Lesson & Six Not so Easy Lessons, Feynman - A brief History of Time, and A Life in Science, Stephen Hawking – Lectures at The Royal Society


Thursday, 10 December 2020

BREXIT: BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE by Mel Cooper

 

WHY DO SERIAL LIAR BORIS & THE TORIES WANT TO
ISOLATE & BANKRUPT BRITAIN? 

BREXIT: BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE

 By Mel Cooper  - 10 December 2020. 

 Recently, Tim Stanley, an historian and journalist, who is a leader writer for the DAILY TELEGRAPH in London, UK, was talking about the wonders of Brexit on SKY News and how we would now get our sovereignty back at last. As a result, he stated, we would no longer be having laws imposed upon us by the EU.

 LAWS IMPOSED UPON US BY THE EU?!? I cried out, choking. I felt like screaming. “Listen, mate, we NEVER had one law imposed upon us.” Why, when people make these inane and illogical assertions does no one ever challenge them. For instance, can Tim Stanley name for me one law that was IMPOSED upon us? Can anyone?

 It cannot be done because we did not ever give up our sovereignty — we pooled it. Think about the difference. Surely it is not too subtle for you. Pooling Sovereignties! Which is, of course, the point of the EU. It is as much a collection of pooled sovereignties as the UK is a collection of four pooled sovereignties, so it is fairly rich that an intelligent, well-educated journalist and historian does not seem to see the parallels or get the drift.

 The UK had (and theoretically still has) the power to VETO all new EU policies and laws. Every EU law, every single one, was discussed, debated, and, guess what, sometimes we decided to compromise for good and sufficient reasons. Votes were taken in the EU parliament, just as they are in Westminster. Often we proposed the laws in the first place and even drafted them for the EU. We were as much part of the process, the third loudest voice, for 45 years as people in parliament who oppose a law, and then it gets passed by a majority, and then, hey presto, they do NOT consider that the law has been IMPOSED upon them! If so, then Brexit was imposed upon nearly 50% of this country and the people who voted against it should be allowed to exit the Brexit. 

How about we form a country within a country consisting of all the cities that voted not to leave the EU? Shall I start making the list?

 It is this kind of thinking and language as used by Tim Stanley on that program on SKY that is going to ruin this country completely in the end. It is this kind of illogical and lazy thinking that is a real danger for us all. Because of the insistence of Brexiteers that we somehow have given up our sovereignty by joining the EU, and because no one is questioning this nonsense properly, Brexit is based upon a total misinterpretation of and even a downright lie about how the system works. To take one example: we are about, for instance, to lose the whole freedom of movement for pets within the EU. That was a British initiative. That was something proposed by and fought for and then passed for the British! And the EU itself will continue to benefit from this idea for people travelling within its territories; but not the UK. It will not be so easy to take your mongrel or moggie to the South of France with you when you rent a summer cottage there. Indeed, it will not be so easy for you to travel within the EU any more either. Or for our kids to get educated at EU universities. And that is just a very tiny start to the changes we are about to have to live with. But hey, folks, that is what you voted for.

 What Brexit means to me, finally, is an act of betrayal. And do not kid yourself. It is not only that we are betraying the vision of a Europe united and at peace. Tim Stanley says that we should be relaxed because once we get our laws back inside our own country and are in total control of them, hey presto, no one wants to change any of the EU initiatives on better working hours, paternity and maternity leave, protection of workers’ rights, etc, etc. Really? Then why are we leaving the EU? Well, apart from demonizing the judiciary and trying to break international law in his internal market bill, PM Boris Johnson’s covert intelligence bill permits undercover agents to break the law. His use of statutory instruments allows him to evade parliamentary scrutiny. Boris Johnson wants to be the one to appoint judges, just like his idol Donald Trump; he is also setting up a review of the Human Rights Act. We are still waiting for Johnson to publish important things like vital independent reports, the Covid procurement contracts and the Brexit impact studies. Or have you not noticed any of these worrying examples, Tim Stanley? Boris and his cabinet are also fairly cavalier about appearing before various parliamentary scrutiny committees. However, maybe this has nothing to do with anything sinister. Maybe they are just all lazy.

 Brexit is not about the people or even about sovereignty. It is about authoritarian rule, unfettered government economic ambitions and isolating the UK from EU initiatives about offshore tax havens so that the UK can become the best, go-to place to launder international money.  Try reading a book called Britannia Unchained published in 2012 by Kwasi Kwarteng, Priti Patel, Dominic Raab, Christ Skidmore and Liz Truss. Perhaps you should have read it before the 2016 Referendum? Are you actually aware of it? So here is a question: is Tim Brexit Stanley simply not aware of any of these activities; is he implicated in this effort of a Boris Takeover; or is he simply too naïve to notice? Personally I do not have a lot of hope in any of the members of the cabinet keeping the faith and not messing around with EU laws that protect workers and citizens’ rights.

I will tell you why. Firstly, because people like Jacob Rees Mogg have an already-declared agenda and are hoping precisely to erode the rights that they feel make them marginally less rich. And notably, we are all leaving the EU but Jacob has moved some of his headquarters to Singapore and Dublin; and Dublin is, emphatically, in the EU. Any thoughts about why? Are no alarm bells ringing?

For me the Brexit Project is about one simple thing: elitist authoritarian control by very far right Tories. And it was sold to voters for one simple reason. Take Back Control is a great slogan for people who feel deprived and challenged in various ways, who feel that they have been excluded. It was based on tweaking people’s feelings of xenophobia. And it feeds in to a strange Superiority Complex that still plagues the English and unthinking nationalists and would-be imperialists of all countries.

 I was very angry at Tim Stanley when I heard him spout the idea that, despite our powerful VETO, we have been having laws imposed upon us by the EU, but I am also very, very saddened that he cannot see how false that idea is. England has indeed been a great country in many ways over the centuries and produced some wonderful writers and scientists and actors and explorers and so forth. But it is now all in jeopardy. As is the whole EU project. And we were the ones to be in the vanguard of de-stabilising it. For centuries Europe has kept descending into wars because of countries that were looking out only for their own narrow and short-term interests and seeing themselves entirely as uncompromisingly at odds with all the other countries around them. So they formed alliances and reformed alliances and fought war after war after war. Whatever the flaws of the EU, the whole project was able for 45 years to avoid that mentality. And look what has happened since we, the UK, voted for Brexit? Right-Wing resurrections in Poland and Hungary and the Czech Republic; France and Marine Le Pen and the damned fisheries. It is all starting up again. And Britain is already slipping from 5th richest to 6th richest to 7th richest. And look at how badly our government, so in love with the authoritarian and centralized approach, has handled the whole pandemic?

 And so here we are, ready to leave the EU on 31 December 2020 as it turns into 2021. Even if we get a deal, it cannot be as good as the EU deal we have that we voted to abandon. Does that not say something important?

 And I suspect strongly that in the future, when the history of this low decade (dominated by Conservatism in this country and Donald Trump’s style of Republicanism in the USA) is written, that Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees Mogg, Dominic Cumming, Michael Gove, Priti Patel and the whole self-serving lot of them will be perceived as traitors to their country that they truly are, people who put their own narrow, blinkered interests before their country’s good; and people who betrayed the rest of Europe to boot - just as Putin and Trump want. They are Quislings, the lot of them, and they do not give any kind of damn for the less privileged citizens of their country.

 But I fear there is no point trying to debate with them or convince the average voter of any of this. You see, Brexit is based on that stupid, proud Superiority Complex of theirs and for the Ruling Elite of our country it is based on their Daily Telegraph approach to their own wealth. They do not give a damn about educating the country. And they do not, I think, speak sincerely or truthfully if it is going to go against their private wishes and secretive agendas. I am sure they are intelligent enough, some of them anyway, to work out the logic behind a false statement like “taking back our sovereignty”. They know perfectly well that every idea they sold you to get Brexit was ultimately based on the false premise that we had given up our sovereignty, not that we had pooled it, which is the truth of the matter. I am certain that they can figure out the difference between giving up sovereignty and pooling it for the common good of all concerned. So if we allow them that much intelligence, they are people totally and completely without integrity or any sense of idealism; and they are liars.

 Thus, my question is: does Tim Stanley believe what he says, has he fallen for it; or is he one of the liars too? And if they or he cannot see it, then they truly are too stupid and incompetent to be believed in any way. Mind you, there is nothing to say that these two things are mutually exclusive — the mind can hold two things at the same time. They can believe in the totally illogical and false while at the same time knowing that they are conning us.

 And so there seems to be nothing we can do, fellow citizens. If we scream, yell, or articulate any protests, all that happens is that the people who can see it agree, but the Make Britain Great Again-ers call what we are saying Project Fear to deflect from the fact that it is actually Project Due Diligence. And they will never change their minds any more than people who wanted to see Dreyfus go to Devil’s Island could be convinced, even after all the evidence that he was innocent was before them; or people who thought six months of Hitler in power would lead to cleaning up the country as he promised and then he could be got rid of. But do not kid yourself. Once people like Boris Johnson and his cohorts get the power, it is very hard to get rid of them. And once they start progressing towards their true, hidden goals that dare not be articulated properly, they go forward step by step eroding all that Britain has stood for democratically and intellectually for a good four hundred years. And so, as in so many things, we are following the USA and just lagging behind it. Think of our Conservative Party as becoming more and more like the Republicans or the Tea Party, in the USA. And think of Boris as being Donald Trump Light. And that is what this country voted for.

 So please tell me at last: what law was imposed on us? Give me one example in the last 45 years of a law that was imposed by the EU against our will, against our sovereignty? One example of a law made by the EU that we did not participate in considering, debating, formulating, voting on, passing and even writing up for the parliament of the EU to ratify? We had a VETO on every decision that impacted on Britain.

 Oh, and then there is the other important thing you might want to think about: that there was no real Opposition at the time of the Referendum. Because life-long-Leaver Jeremy Corbyn and his intellectually limp gang had control of the supposedly opposing party and undermined the campaign to maintain our membership in the EU. I blame Corbyn, his cohorts and that ineffably old fashioned dinosaur Len McCluskey (Labour’s flip side of the Dominic Cummings coin) as much as I blame Boris Johnson and his people.

 But right now I think I am going to go out and sing Christmas carols in the street and cheer myself up by hibernating, probably for up to a decade. When I re-emerge, we will see who was right about Brexit and immigration – me or Priti Patel.

********

11 DEC 2020 Letter to The Guardian:

The Guardian headline  “Johnson tells ministers to prepare for no-deal Brexit” 11 Dec 20, and your several commentaries forecasting 2% fall in GDP, “But we plucky Brits will get through it” are ridiculously optimistic. Prepare how? Prepare for what? They must be penned by people who have never built a business, marketed exports or financed a payroll. All respected global agencies from the Bank of England to Bloomberg have consistently warned of 8% drop in GDP and 15% - 20% fall in Sterling – for any Brexit. That translates to 5 to 7 million UK job losses or equivalent reduction of wages. 

Any Brexit, spurning our share of “The largest and richest market – ever” will bankrupt Britain. It is what Rees Mogg and chums in their tax-havens are betting on; they will blame the calamity on Covid-19 but Covid will have a V shaped recovery. Cafes, Pubs, Hairdressers, Nail bars, Theatres, Vacations etc. and other pleasures will quickly switch back on, accelerated by the Internet-Revolution. 

Basic, essential, serious agriculture, engineering and City of London services, our exports, sabotaged and fragmented by Brexit, will be swallowed whole by competing nations. Our only hope is to stop and abandon this idiotic, moronic, suicidal Brexit. – Noel Hodson, Oxford.

 Noel Hodson - Director

Tax Reconciliations, 16 Brookside, Oxford, OX3 7PJ UK,

From Tax-Havens to Safe Havens

Tel +44 1865 (0)760994 Mobile 07713 681216 

Noel Hodson Blog


Wednesday, 28 October 2020

TRUMP MUST GO!

 

"LOCK HIM UP"  "LOCK HIM UP"  "LOCK HIM UP"

UPDATE 16 FEBRUARY 2022

EXCELLENT NEWS: As with Al Capone, it is the bookkeeper who will put him in Alcatraz. Lets hear it for the bean counters! A rapscallion businessman would try to alter the past accounting records by “file dressing”; but that is the most obvious, dangerous and dumb thing that anyone under investigation can do. The authorities and IRS only ask questions to which they already have the answers. Noel.

 

PS – Did I say “I told you so”? Or was I too modest?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/feb/15/donald-trump-mazars-accountants-legal-woes

Donald Trump’s legal woes threaten to engulf him as accountants abandon ship

Mazars’ cutting ties with ex-president mark significant step in New York investigation of his financial affairs, among 19 current cases


Donald Trump at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on 20 January 2021 as he leaves office. Legal woes have pursued him since. Photograph: Alex Edelman/AFP/Getty Images

Ed Pilkington  - UK GUARDIAN NEWSPAPER

@edpilkington

Wed 16 Feb 2022 06.00 GMT 

The news that the longtime accounting firm for the Trump Organization has cut ties with the company and retracted 10 years of its financial statements is a new and serious blow to Donald Trump’s increasingly frenzied battle to fend off the legal investigations that are rapidly engulfing him.

The revelation that Mazars USA last week ended its relationship with the Trump family comes at a perilous moment for the former president as he strives to protect himself, his family and his business from legal threats that are now coming thick and fast.

A Guardian tally this month found that Trump was facing a total of 19 legal challenges, six of which involve alleged financial irregularities.

Advertisement

By withdrawing its stamp of approval from the documents, Mazars leaves Trump potentially exposed to substantial legal and financial trouble.

The papers, known as statements of financial condition, were used by Trump and his family business to attract and secure hundreds of millions of dollars in loans. They are also at the centre of an escalating investigation by the New York state attorney general, Letitia James.

Last month James tightened the screws on Trump and the Trump Organization by releasing details in a filing of several instances involving golf courses, real estate and other assets where the family had allegedly “falsely and fraudulently valued multiple assets and misrepresented those values to financial institutions for economic benefit”.

In a letter dated 9 February, Mazars’ general counsel, William Kelly, told the Trump Organization that the annual financial statements it had prepared for the family business between 2011 and 2020 were no longer reliable.

The accountants said they had based their decision partly on their own investigation into Trump’s finances and on the “totality of the circumstances”, concluding that “we are not able to provide any new work product to the Trump Organization”.

On the back of James’s latest attack, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney and an ex-vice president of the Trump Organization, told the Guardian that in his opinion “the House of Trump is crumbling”.

James’s investigation is one of the most advanced and potentially dangerous of all the 19 legal actions bearing down on Trump. The inquiry is being pursued on both civil and criminal lines.

James is working in tandem with a separate criminal investigation by the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg. That inquiry is also looking into whether Trump and his family concern defrauded lenders or underpaid taxes by falsely representing his assets.

The New York state attorney general, Letitia James, is leading a civil investigation into the Trump Organization in parallel with a criminal investigation by the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg. Photograph: Joy Malone/Reuters

The disclosure that Mazars had broken off relations with Trump was included in a new court filing from James on Monday as part of her ongoing attempt to force Trump and his two eldest children, Donald Jr and Ivanka, to testify under subpoena.

Trump has consistently denied financial impropriety and has attempted to cast doubt on James’s investigation by denouncing it as a partisan witch-hunt. James is a Democrat, while Trump won the presidency in 2016 as a Republican.

The Trump Organization said it was “disappointed” by Mazars’ decision but tried to spin the development in a positive light. It selectively cited a line in the Mazars letter that said that “we have not concluded that the various financial statements, as a whole, contain material discrepancies”, adding that the comment rendered the James and Bragg investigations “moot”.

As Trump’s legal and financial woes deepen, he is also being assailed by a flurry of bad news surrounding the congressional investigation into the January 6 insurrection at the US Capitol. Trump, who is at the centre of the House select committee inquiry given that his “big lie” that the 2020 election was stolen from him drew thousands of his supporters to the Capitol building that day, has been trying to persuade his closest advisers not to cooperate.

This week it was revealed that John Eastman, a conservative law professor who was integral to attempts to persuade the then vice president, Mike Pence, to delay certification of Joe Biden’s victory on January 6, has handed over 8,000 pages of emails to the committee.

It has also become known that Rudy Giuliani, who as Trump’s lawyer was a key figure in the campaign to overturn the presidential election results, has opened a dialogue with the committee that could see him testifying in some form.

*******

UPDATE - 25 NOV 2020

 Washington Monthly “Whether or not Donald Trump is president when the bills come due in 2024, he may still walk away with up to $150 million in tax savings to use over the next decade. So, whatever the verdict is on Trump’s business acumen, he has a singular knack for making money while losing other people’s money.”

 A fascinating detailed analysis of Trump’s tax dodges. I do not know the labyrinthine USA tax system – but I can guess why Trump endlessly repeats that he can’t publish his tax returns “because I’m under investigation by the IRS.” The losses & “depreciation” he personally claims (losses of other people’s money), as his personal tax losses, are still subject to IRS audit.

 The IRS will ultimately only allow losses that Trump has himself paid. According to this Washington Monthly article, he has paid very little – but claimed all the losses (by mistake, error or criminally). His tax losses, say over the past 20-30 years, will be limited to his own tax-deductible payments – excluding the billions his duped lenders, shareholders and suppliers have lost. Those are not his losses – he cannot claim them.

 And - It is highly likely that he has indulged in funny-money transfers between the dozens of Trump companies onshore and offshore – to generate personal tax losses; such bookkeeping entries will be corrected by the IRS. The final adjusted IRS-agreed tax bills will then be subject to back-duty-tax costs, compound interest and penalties. On these assumptions, I previously calculated that he owes $2 to $3 billion in back taxes. Giuliani, Arthur Andersen or Al Capone might be able to argue otherwise.

 As he resigns as President, will he have the power to forgive his own sins – as he claims but most US legal authorities deny? It probably depends on how much The US Treasury needs his cash.

******

STEROIDS: Is this what Trump uses to keep going? If so, he might be inviting more mental problems. In fact he could be suffering side-effects now.  Body builders used steroids in the 1960s,  - until they found it made them manic and violent. Regular steroid abuse is associated with Parkinson's Disease. Three doses per annum is thought to be the safe limit. 

The use of corticosteroids is strongly associated to the development of psychiatric/neurological side effects. These effects are due to the wide expression of GR in the brain, and their long-term modulation can lead to functional and anatomical alterations, which might be responsible for the observed side-effects.
by M Ciriaco · ‎2013 · ‎Cited by 142 · ‎Related articles
Abstract · ‎INTRODUCTION · ‎CASE REPORT 

Spread the word. This from today’s (28 Oct 20) Guardian lead editorial. Usually traditional, calm and conservative with a small 'C' The Manchester Guardian - now just The Guardian, one of the freest and most reliable news sources in the world, pens Trump's dismissal notice. ... And, if he still won't pay his back taxes - then LOCK HIM UP.

 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/ng-interactive/2020/oct/27/the-guardian-view-on-the-2020-us-elections-its-time-to-dump-trump-americas-only-hope-is-joe-biden

  

The Guardian view on the 2020 US elections - It’s time to dump Trump. America’s only hope is Joe Biden

Four years of deranged and unpredictable behaviour is proof that the current US president is uniquely unsuited to the job Support the Guardian’s independent, open journalism

 

Donald Trump’s presidency has been a horror show that is ending with a pandemic that is out of control, an economic recession and deepening political polarisation. Mr Trump is the author of this disastrous denouement. He is also the political leader least equipped to deal with it. Democracy in the United States has been damaged by Mr Trump’s first term. It may not survive four more years.

If the Guardian had a vote, it would be cast to elect Joe Biden as president next Tuesday. Mr Biden has what it takes to lead the United States. Mr Trump does not. Mr Biden cares about his nation’s history, its people, its constitutional principles and its place in the world. Mr Trump does not. Mr Biden wants to unite a divided country. Mr Trump stokes an anger that is wearing it down.

The Republican presidential nominee is not, and has never been, a fit and proper person for the presidency. He has been accused of rape. He displays a brazen disregard for legal norms. In office, he has propagated lies and ignorance. It is astonishing that his financial interests appear to sway his outlook on the national interest. His government is cruel and mean. It effectively sanctioned the kidnapping and orphaning of migrant children by detaining them and deporting their parents. He has vilified whistleblowers and venerated war criminals.

Mr Trump trades in racism, misogyny, homophobia and transphobia. Telling the Proud Boys, a far-right group that has endorsed violence, to “stand back and stand by” was, in the words of Mr Biden, “a dog whistle about as big as a foghorn”. From the Muslim ban to building a wall on the Mexican border, the president is grounding his base in white supremacy. With an agenda of corporate deregulation and tax giveaways for the rich, Mr Trump is filling the swamp, not draining it.

A narcissist, Mr Trump seems incapable of acknowledging the suffering of others. Coronavirus has exposed a devastating lack of presidential empathy for those who have died and the families they left behind. Every day reveals the growing gap between the level of competence required to be president and Mr Trump’s ability. He is protected from the truth by cronies whose mob-like fealty to their boss has seen six former aides sentenced to prison. A post-shame politician, Mr Trump outrageously commuted the sentence of one of his favoured lackeys this summer. The idea that there is one rule for wealthy elites and another for the ordinary voter damages trust in the American system. Mr Trump couldn’t care less.

The people’s enemy

Like other aspiring autocrats, Mr Trump seeks to delegitimise his opposition as “enemies of the people” to mobilise his base. In 2016, the institutions that should have acted as a check on Mr Trump’s rise to power failed to stop him. This time there has been some pushback over a Trump disinformation campaign about Mr Biden’s son. It is an indictment of the Trump age that social media companies acted before politicians in the face of a clear and present danger to democracy.

Mr Biden has his flaws, but he understands what they are and how to temper them. Seen as too centrist in the Democratic primaries, his election platform has borrowed ideas from the progressive wing of his party and incorporated a “green new deal” and free college for the middle class. Mr Biden should not retreat into his comfort zone. The failures of capitalism have been thrown into sharp relief by the pandemic. If elected, he will raise taxes on richer Americans and spend more on public services. This is the right and fair thing to do when a thin sliver of America has almost half the country’s wealth.

It’s not just Americans for whom Mr Biden is a better bet. The world could breathe easier with Mr Trump gone. The threat from Pyongyang and Tehran has grown thanks to President Trump. A new face in the White House would restore America’s historic alliances and present a tougher test to the authoritarians in Moscow and Beijing than the fawning Mr Trump. On climate change, Mr Biden would return the United States to the Paris agreement and give the world a fighting chance to keep global temperatures in check. With a President Biden there would be a glimmer of hope that the US would return as a guarantor of a rules-based international order.

Perhaps no country has so much to lose from Mr Biden’s victory as Britain. It has the misfortune of being led by Boris Johnson, whom Democrats bracket with Mr Trump as another rule-breaking populist. Mr Biden, a Catholic proud of his Irish roots, has already warned the Johnson government that it must not jeopardise the Good Friday agreement in its Brexit negotiations. Having left the EU, the UK can no longer be America’s bridge across the Atlantic. Unfortunately, Britain has a prime minister who led the country out of Europe just when an incoming President Biden would be looking to partner with it.

Faustian pact

Whether Mr Trump is defeated or not next week, Americans will have to learn to live with Trumpism for years to come. The first impeached president to run for re-election, Mr Trump avoided being the first to be removed from office because the Republican party has lost its moral compass. The party of Abraham Lincoln has become subsumed by the politics of grievance and entitlement. The GOP turns a blind eye to Mr Trump’s transgressions in return for preserving the privileged status of white Christian America.

The most obvious sign of this Faustian pact is the Senate’s confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the US supreme court — Mr Trump’s third justice. Conservatives now have a 6-3 advantage in the highest court in the land. Compliant judges are key to retaining the status quo when Republicans face a shrinking electoral base. The Republican strategy is twofold: first is voter suppression; if that fails, Mr Trump appears ready to reject the result. He has spent years conditioning his supporters, especially those armed to the hilt, to mistrust elections and to see fraud where it doesn’t exist.

We have been here before. In 2000, Al Gore won the popular vote by more than half a million ballots. The election turned on a handful of votes needed to capture the electoral vote in Florida. But the votes that counted were not found in the Sunshine State. They were cast by the five supreme court justices named by Republican presidents who gave the election to George W Bush.

In the 2018 midterms, a coalition of millions marched into polling booths to disavow the president. It is heartening that more than 60 million people have cast their ballot in early voting at a time when the president is doing much to call US democracy into question amid baseless claims of a “rigged election”. Americans are busily embracing their democratic right, and a record turnout in this election may show that voters, worried about whether democracy would endure, strove to save it. Anything other than a vote for Mr Biden is a vote to unleash a supercharged Trumpism. All pretence of civility would be dropped. The divides of race, class and sex would become even wider. Mr Trump is a symptom of America’s decline. Finding a solution to this problem begins with a vote for Mr Biden.

Support the Guardian’s independent, open journalism